“Understanding Comics” is a perfect
blend of educational and informative literature. It delves into the psychology
behind cartoons and how we relate to them in a way that I’ve never read before.
The novel sparked a lot of “aha” moments when describing what makes cartoons and
comics so appealing and I completely understand why this is known as the
definitive book on comics.
An idea that I found fascinating is
when Scott McCloud explained why it’s so easy to relate to cartoons. The more
simplified a cartoon is, the easier it is to relate yourself to the character. He
explains that the human brain takes in the appearance of others in vivid detail
while our sense of self is more vague. We don’t see what we look like all the
time. This is a concept that I’ve noticed for years but have never been able to
explain. I see these principles all the time when I babysit. I can watch any
cartoon with a group of kids and they will immediately start assigning who in
the room is which character on the show. Regardless if the characters are crudely drawn or even a completely different species. They become instantly invested in
what’s happening because they have made this connection to the character that
they think best encompasses them.
McCloud then makes the distinction
between the sensory and conceptual world in cartoons. Everything in relation to
us, or the character we are relating to, is a part of the conceptual experience
while the objects and settings are sensory. This is why a lot of cartoons place
their simplistically drawn characters in much more detailed worlds. The cartoon
is the mask that we as the viewer are putting on and the world is a rich and exciting
place for us to explore. This concept is used all over the place in animation
and it’s even apparent in CG movies. For instance, in the movie Tangled,
all of the characters are modeled to be stylized in a typical Disney fashion. They all have large expressive eyes and their faces aren’t too
realistically textured with extraneous details like pores. Despite the
character’s simplicity, the landscapes of the film are almost photorealistic.
There are individual blades of grass in the fields and rays of sunlight shining
through trees.
It’s exactly the aesthetic type that Scott McCloud describes in
the graphic novel and now I understand why so many cartoons choose this technique. How could you not want to picnic in that forrest? This technique is so common place in comics and cartoons that you don't even think about it. "Understanding Comics" gave me the underlying meaning behind comic book conventions and my experience with the medium will become much richer because of it.